An infinite half space is subjected to two concentrated loads shown in the Figure. The values of the loads are F1 = F2 = F = 250 kN/m, their distance is 2a = 2.4 m. Calculate the stresses in points 1-3 with the application of superposition and the Boussinesq solution. Name the special stress-state at each point. Check the resistance in Point 3 with the Rankine, Tresca and von Mises (HMH) failure criteria, if f = 200 kN/m2.
Solve Problem
Point 1 Radial stress, Point 2 Radial stress, Point 3 Radial stress, Failure load from the relevant failure criterion (minimum failure load of Rankine, Tresca and von Mises criterion), Ft [kN]
Solve
Do you need help?
Steps
Step 1. Calculate radial stress from load F1 using the Boussinesq formula. The distance of Point 1 from the point of application of load F1 is 2a. The angle between the axis of the load and the polar coordinate axis, r is 45°. Step 2. Calculate radial stress from load F2 using the Boussinesq formula. Axis r is perpendicular to the load’s axis, thus no stress arise from F2. Step 3. Give total stresses of Point 1. Illustrate stress’ direction. Name the stress state of the point. The point is subjected to uniaxial compression. Point 2 Step 1. Calculate radial stress from load F1 and F1 using the Boussinesq formula. φ= 90° for both loads, thus no stress arises at point 2 (cos 90o = 0, Boussinesq formula results in zero stress). Point 3 Step 1. Calculate radial stress from load F1 using the Boussinesq formula. The distance of Point 3 from the point of application of load F1 is a. The angle between the axis of the load and the polar coordinate axis, r is 135°. Step 2. Calculate radial stress from load F2 using the Boussinesq formula. The distance of Point 3 from the point of application of load F2 is a. The angle between the axis of the load and the polar coordinate axis, r is -135°. Step 3. Summarize stresses of Point 3 arising from loads F1 and F2. Illustrate stress’ direction. Name the stress state of the point. The point is subjected to uniaxial tension. Step 4. Check resistance with Rankine failure criterion. Equation The material is safe. The failure load is Step 5. Check resistance with Tresca failure criterion. The material is safe. The failure load is equivalent to that of Rankine criterion: Step 6. Check resistance with von Mises failure criterion. The material is safe. The failure load is The failure load results in the same values for all the failure criteria.Step by step
Point 1
Check stress
Check stress
Check total stress
Check total stress
Check stress
Check stress
Check total stress
Check Rankine criterion
Check Tresca criterion
Check von Mises criterion
Results
The distance of Point 1 from the point of application of load F1 is 2a. The angle between the axis of the load and the polar coordinate axis, r is 45°. Radial stress from load F1 is given by the Boussinesq formula: Radius of the stress arises from load F2 is perpendicular to the load’s axis, thus no stress arise from F2 (cos 90o = 0, Boussinesq formula results in zero). The total stress is The point is subjected to uniaxial compression. For Point 2 the rotation angle, φ= 90° for both loads, thus no stress arises at point 2 (cos 90o = 0, Boussinesq formula results in zero stress). The distance of Point 3 from the point of application of load F2 is a. The angle between the axis of the load and the polar coordinate axis, r is -135°. Radial stress from load F2 is: Summation of the above stresses is The point is subjected to uniaxial tension. Check resistance with Rankine failure criterion. The material is safe. The failure load is The material is safe. The failure load is equivalent to that of Rankine criterion: Check resistance with von Mises failure criterion. The material is safe. The failure load is The failure load results in the same values for all the failure criteria.Worked out solution
Point 1
Point 2
Point 3
The distance of Point 3 from the point of application of load F1 is a. The angle between the axis of the load and the polar coordinate axis, r is 135°.
Equation
Check resistance with Tresca failure criterion.